Search Results for "principal employer liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "principal employer liability"

438 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Hotel Employees Terminated Without Notice or Wages Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-conditions of Notice and Compensation.

5 Dec 2018

The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions filed by workmen and their employer, Eastern International Hotel, challenging an order dated 06/06/2...

High Court

"High Court Upholds Employees Compensation in Mangalore Air Crash Case" "Significant ruling on compensation, foreign exchange rate application, and principal employer liability under EC Act."

23 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court affirmed the compensation awarded under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (EC Act). The Court dealt with significant issues, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Recovery Order Under EPF Act for Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasonable Notice. The order dated 08.12.2025 under Section 8-F(3)(i) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, was set aside as it was passed without prior reasonable notice, relying on a stale notice from 2017, and despite pending restoration of an appeal, with directions to refund Rs.3,65,86,242/- recovered from the petitioner's bank accounts.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the Municipal Council, Pusad, challenging an order dated 08.12.2025 passed by the Recovery Officer und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer’s Writ Petition Against Industrial Court’s Direction to Absorb Employees as Canal Inspectors – Findings of Unfair Labour Practice under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Upheld. Direction to absorb employees on the post of Canal Inspector from the date of complaint was based on evidence that employees had completed training, passed departmental examination, and were actually performing duties of the higher post, with employer failing to act despite available vacancies.

9 Jan 2006

The writ petition was filed by the State Government and its officers challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which had declared that the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company to Recover Compensation Paid Under Motor Vehicle Act Despite Policy Breach — Insurer Can Be Directed to Pay Third Parties but Has Right to Recover from Owner for Violation of Policy Conditions.

6 Sep 2017

The case involves three first appeals filed by United India Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Addresses Reference on Withdrawal of ACPS Benefits for Non-Qualification in Departmental Test. Court Examines Whether Failing to Achieve Benchmark Marks in Promotion Examination Constitutes Ineligibility or Disqualification Justifying Withdrawal under 2001 and 2010 Government Resolutions.

12 Apr 2024

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was tasked with answering a reference framed by a Division Bench regarding the circumstances under which benef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petition Against Interest on Retrenchment Compensation. Industrial Tribunal's Direction to Pay 12% Interest Set Aside as Employer Had Bona Fide Offered Payment and Amount Was Not Retained, Compliant with Sections 25-F, 25-G, 25-H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

15 Feb 2017

This writ petition arose from an industrial dispute concerning the retrenchment of 43 workmen by M/s. Bombay Film Enterprises Private Limited, a film ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeals, Upholding Arbitral Award Against Project Owner in Construction Dispute. Project Owner Bound by Arbitration Clause Though Non-Signatory, Owing to Active Participation and Common Intention Under Cox and Kings Principle.

3 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court considered three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a construction contract dis...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)