Search Results for "ouster clause"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ouster clause"

260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Daughter Entitled to Half Share in Ancestral and Self-Acquired Properties. Daughter's claim for partition upheld as co-parcenary rights under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 apply equally to daughter and son.

28 Apr 2022

The appellant, Smt. P L Nanjamma, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Company Fraud Case. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Section 10GB of Companies Act, 1956 for Fraud Allegations.

13 Oct 2016

The appellants, M/s. Candolim Developers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sunil Thukral, filed a suit before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entry Based on Will in Land Revenue Case — Civil Court Decree Binding on Revenue Authorities. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Amrutrao Shankarrao Deshmukh and Dhananjay Amrutrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

10 Jul 2017

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal in Partition Suit Based on Res Judicata and Invalid Will. The suit was barred under Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as prior litigation had conclusively established a valid partition in 1964, extinguishing the testator's ownership rights and rendering the will ineffective.

27 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff, who claimed a one-fourth share in joint family properties based on a will execute...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim by Co-owner. Court holds that a co-owner in possession cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is ouster or denial of title, and that a preliminary decree for partition can be passed even if some properties are not available for division.

12 Nov 2021

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2015...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appellate Injunction in Municipal Corporation Land Dispute — Adverse Possession Claim Requires Strong Prima Facie Evidence of Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owner. The court held that a claim of adverse possession against a municipal corporation must be supported by clear evidence of hostile possession and that public interest outweighs private claims in such cases.

27 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute between the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation (petitioner/defendant) and Dattatraya Vithoba Aatyalkar (respondent/plaintiff) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

9 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.

5 Dec 2013

The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Remedy Under Industrial Disputes Act Is Available to Non-Teaching Staff of Private School in View of Exclusive Remedy Under MEPS Act. Labour Court Had Dismissed References as Not Maintainable Citing Adarsh Shikshan Sanstha and St. Ulai High School Decisions.

9 Dec 2016

Two writ petitions were filed by non-teaching staff of a private school challenging Labour Court awards that dismissed their references under the Indu...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)