Search Results for "mineral development"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "mineral development"

338 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 338 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Applicability of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to Quarrying on Alleged Forest Land. Petitioner challenges communications requiring forest clearance certificate for quarry operations on government land in Survey No. 124, Hadonahalli Village, raising the question whether the land is forest land under the Act.

30 Apr 2026

The petition was filed by a stone crushing firm challenging communications that interdicted its quarrying and crushing operations on the ground that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against Sand Ghat Auctions — Petitioners Challenge Validity on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Earlier Court Order and New State Policy. The Court Examines Whether Auctions Violate Environmental Norms and Whether Petitioners Have Standing.

19 Apr 2018

Background: Three writ petitions came before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging auction notices for sand ghats in Nagpur, Bhandara,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Closure Orders Against Stone Crushing Plants Under Section 133 CrPC for Lack of Preliminary Order and Imminent Danger Finding. The court held that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate must first pass a conditional order and record a finding of present injury before directing closure under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

12 Aug 2024

The petitioners operated stone crushing plants in Uran, Raigad, with valid consents from MPCB and mining licenses. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Petitions to Quash Criminal Proceedings under MMRD Act and IPC. Common Legal Question Addressed Regarding Maintainability of Prosecution under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard a batch of petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking the qu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

2 Aug 2013

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Junior Officers in NMDC for Violation of Natural Justice. Termination Order Set Aside as Employer Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Dismissal.

25 Jan 2016

The petitioners, Khajbabu Sheik, P. Thanesh Kumar, Venkata Sudarshan, and others, were employed as Junior Officers (Mines) at the Donimalai Iron Ore M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

21 Aug 2018

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

16 Aug 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Development Charges Demand on Nazul Land for TDR-Based Construction — No Legal Basis for Levy Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or Nagpur Land Rules. The court held that the Nazul Tahsildar cannot demand development charges for NOC to sell flats constructed using TDR on nazul land as there is no statutory provision authorizing such levy.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Thapar, owner of nazul Plot No.94 in Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, entered into a development agreement with M/s Raghav Life Spaces on 22 ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under MMRD Act and IPC; Non-Cognizable Offences Cannot Be Investigated Without Written Complaint by Authorized Officer.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, adjudicated a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)