KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "bona fide delay"
1253 result(s) found
Found 1253 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction in Land Allotment Dispute Involving Cooperative Housing Society. Notice of Motion Seeks to Restrain Creation of Third Party Rights Over ~23 Acres Prime Land in Versova, Mumbai.
7 Oct 2014The judgment text provided only includes the introductory paragraphs outlining the nature of the dispute and the relief sought, without the court's an...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Zilla Parishad's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders After 8-Year Delay. Delay of 8 years and 1 month in challenging Industrial Court's judgment not satisfactorily explained; petitions dismissed on ground of laches and delay.
11 Sep 2015The petitioner, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad Jalna, filed two writ petitions challenging the common judgment dated 19/12/2006 passed ...
- 81
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows University's Appeal in Delay Condonation Case — Sets Aside High Court Order, Directs Hearing on Merits. Delay of 916 days in filing LPA condoned as University's decision-making process involving Executive Council and expert committees constituted sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
17 Dec 2019The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the University of Delhi against a common judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 29.10.2018, which declined...
- 330
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.
9 Oct 2014The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...
- 223
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's failure to pursue remedies diligently and absence of sufficient cause for delay of over three years led to dismissal.
1 Oct 2015The petitioner, Popat Sitaram Godge, was terminated from service on 22.05.1994 by the respondent educational institution. He initially filed a civil s...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses SLP Against High Court's Refusal to Condon 5659-Day Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal — Delay Not Explained with Sufficient Cause, Limitation Act Sections 3 and 5 Balanced.
16 Apr 2024The case arises from the acquisition of land in Gandluru village, Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, in 1989 for the Telugu Ganga Project. Dissatisfied ...
- 1104
High Court
High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.
23 Apr 2014The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Listed Interim Application in Commercial Suit Involving Real Estate Companies and Partnership Firm. The Application Sought Interim Relief in Dispute Between Developers and Property Holding Entities.
1 Jan 1970The extracted material consists solely of the cause title and preliminary details in Interim Application (L) No.5452 of 2025 arising from Commercial S...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...
- 91
