High Court of Judicature at Bombay Listed Interim Application in Commercial Suit Involving Real Estate Companies and Partnership Firm. The Application Sought Interim Relief in Dispute Between Developers and Property Holding Entities.

Case Note & Summary

The extracted material consists solely of the cause title and preliminary details in Interim Application (L) No.5452 of 2025 arising from Commercial Suit (L) No.39332 of 2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Commercial Division. The application was filed by three applicants: M/s. Kamla Landmarc Real Estate Holding Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, and two individual respondents, Jitendra Ramesh Jain and Jinendra Ramesh Jain, all located at Shantivimal Building, Ground Floor, Sir P. M. Road, Ville Parle East, Mumbai. The underlying commercial suit was instituted by two plaintiffs: M/s. Image Developer, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, having its address at Malad East, Mumbai, and M/s. Segment Developers Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its address at Kandivali East, Mumbai. The defendants in the suit included the three applicants as well as Dilipkumar Jain and Vikaskumar C. Jain, both individuals at the same Vile Parle East address; M/s Moral Mercantile LLP, a limited liability partnership registered under the LLP Act, 2008, at Opera House, Mumbai; and M/s Sailee Developers Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act. No further details are available regarding the nature of the dispute, the interim relief sought, or the commercial subject matter. The excerpt does not include any paragraphs, legal reasoning, citations, or operative directions; it ends mid-word in a parenthetical reference to an act, indicating that the provided text is incomplete. The case number includes '2025' and the citation reference '2025:BHC-OS:15574', but the exact date of the judgment is not stated. No judge names, advocate names, or case law references are present. Consequently, it is impossible to summarise the factual background, issues, arguments, analysis, or decision because none of those elements appear in the excerpt. All substantive fields in this structured extraction are therefore marked as 'Not mentioned' or left as empty arrays to reflect the absence of information. The only verifiable facts are the identities and legal forms of the parties, the court jurisdiction, and the case identifiers.

Issue of Consideration