Search Results for "amendment rules 2022"

1286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case.

The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Buyer in Scrap Sale Contract Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court Restrains Seller from Selling Scrap to Third Parties Pending Arbitration, Holding Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Buyer.

The petitioner, Chetan Iron LLP, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pending arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...