Search Results for "amalgamation scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "amalgamation scheme"

324 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

18 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of MIDC Plot to Auction Purchaser in Winding Up Proceedings — Official Liquidator's Sale Confirmed Despite MIDC's Objection. Court holds that MIDC cannot refuse transfer of property sold by Official Liquidator in company winding up, as the sale is conducted under court supervision and the purchaser steps into the shoes of the company.

21 Aug 2020

The applicant, M/s. Metal Tubes and Rolling Mills, filed a Company Application seeking directions against the Regional Officer, MIDC (Respondent No.2)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 50-Year Delay in Land Revenue Appeal — Unreasonable Delay Not Explained. Superintendent of Land Records lacked jurisdiction to condone inordinate delay under Section 247 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 without proper cause.

4 Oct 2023

The case involves a writ petition filed by M/s. Aluwid Architectural Private Ltd and others (petitioners) challenging an order dated 6 September 2022 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

23 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC as Previous Consultation with State Agricultural Marketing Board Not Validly Conducted. The requirement of 'previous consultation' under Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 was not satisfied as the consultation was held only with the Board's office bearers instead of the full Board.

9 Apr 2013

Fifteen directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition to Strike Off Plaint in Owners Association Dispute — Suit Barred by Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, 1994 and Specific Relief Act, 1963. Owners Association lacked authority to sue for common areas; proper remedy was under the Act or arbitration.

26 Feb 2026

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by Hiranandani Amalfi Owners Association (petitioner) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

30 Sep 2024

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Circular Excluding Primary Cooperative Credit Societies from Deposit Insurance Coverage. Circular dated 22.02.2008 Held Valid as It Merely Clarifies Existing Definition Under Section 2(g) of DICGC Act, 1961.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by cooperative credit societies challenging a circular dated 22.02.2008 issued by the Reserve Bank of I...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)