Search Results for "Unauthorized Constructions"

384 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Apartment Construction in Residential Zone. Petitioners failed to prove zoning violation or need for environmental clearance; BBMP's approval upheld.

The petitioners, Sri. V. Dhamodaran and others, residents of Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of an apart...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Construction and Occupancy Certificate. National Commission's Directions Modified: Builder to Pay Rs. 25 Lakhs with Interest, Convey Title After Occupancy Certificate.

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal by M/s Treaty Construction & Anr. against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005

The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Project Proponent's Environmental Clearance in Construction Dispute Under Amended EIA Regime. Environmental Clearance Granted by Local Authority Valid as Per Notification Dated 9.12.2016, Protecting Existing Constructions but Requiring Fresh Clearance for Future Expansion.

The dispute centered on the validity of an Environmental Clearance (EC) obtained by a project proponent for a construction project in Maharashtra. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...