Search Results for "Stamp duty refund"

288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Relief from Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suit — Transfer of Property Act Section 52. Court allows defendant to be relieved from lis pendens upon deposit of Rs.8 lakhs, balancing plaintiff's claim with defendant's right to deal with property.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 13 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the Appellant, the original Plaintiff, du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Development Dispute — Plaintiff Allowed to Bring on Record Subsequent Events Including Deed of Conveyance and Alleged Fraudulent Tenancy. Court holds that pre-trial amendments should be liberally allowed to determine real controversy between parties.

The plaintiff, M/s SR Enterprises, filed a Commercial Suit against defendants Gurbachan Kaur Jattinder Singh Chadha and another, arising out of a Deve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance and Possession. Sale Agreement Dated 24.07.2010 for 1.18 Acres Land with Advance of Rs.1,00,000 Forms Basis of Dispute.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of Original Suit No. 48 of 2017 by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) Court, Arni, on 23.10.2018. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit — Defendant's Vague Defence of Security Cheques Not a Triable Issue. The court upheld the decree for Rs.61,00,000/- with interest under Order 37 CPC, as the defendant failed to disclose a plausible defence.

The respondent/plaintiff, Pravin Hiralal Shah, filed a summary suit against the appellant/defendant, Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia, for recovery of...