Search Results for "MMC Act 1888"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Tenants Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building. Court upholds eviction and demolition orders based on structural safety reports and compliance with statutory procedures under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 and Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioners, residents of Building No. 12 in Mathuradas Colony, Kalina, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Pre-Deposit Condition for Appeal Entertainment Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Pre-deposit under Section 217(2)(d) is mandatory for entertaining appeal, and interim relief cannot be granted without compliance.

The petitioners, Fleet Fastners Private Limited and another, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 13 July 2011 by the Municipal Corporation of Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Water Charges for Industry in Non-Conforming Zone. Water Charges at Higher Rate of Rs.44 per 1000 litres Upheld as Per Water Charges Rules (Revised) w.e.f. 1-4-1996.

The petitioners, Dhunjibhoy Ice Factory Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...