Search Results for "Auction Purchase"

632 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 632 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor in Execution Case Despite Decree Modified Only as to Interest. Decree Holder Auction Purchaser Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 144 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for recovery of money. The original plaintiffs (Respondent Nos. 1-3) filed Special Civil Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.

The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Attachment Notices Against Third-Party Purchaser for Excise Dues of Defaulter. Central Excise Cannot Attach Property Sold Prior to Creation of Dues Without Notice to Purchaser Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Petitioner, M/s Runwal Constructions, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, engaged in construction and developmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Release of Secured Asset on Partial Payment Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 requires full payment of dues for redemption, and partial payment does not entitle the borrower to reclaim the property.

The dispute arose between a bank, as secured creditor, and a borrower over the enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstru...