Search Results for "1984 Amendment"

1485 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1485 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhanced Interest Upheld. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application for Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Affirmed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 7th February 1992, which granted inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Habeas Corpus Petition Examines Legality of Judicial Custody Where Remand Was Not Extended by Competent MCOC Special Court; Accused in Telgi Stamp Scam Seek Release After Non‑Extension of Judicial Remand Under Section 309(2) CrPC by a Judge Not Appointed Under MCOC Act.

The petitioners, five accused in the Telgi stamp scam (Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the MCOC Court at Pune), filed this writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practices in MRTU & PULP Act Case. Employer directed to reinstate employee with full back wages and permanency benefits for engaging in unfair labour practices under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in supply of textile machinery and civil construction, challenged th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges for Housing Scheme — Upholds Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act and Karnataka Housing Board Act. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of statutory provisions or fundamental rights in acquisition for public purpose.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for a housing scheme by the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Not Properly Served, Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside. Service of Summons Found Insufficient Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, Suit Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner, Vijay Mohan Jagtap, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the trial court in Regular Civil Suit No. 368/2007. The fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds High Court's Decree for 5/9th Share but Sets Aside Sale to Third Party. Defendant No. 7's Sale of Joint Family Property to Defendant No. 9 Held Void as Purchaser Had Notice of Pending Suit.

The case pertains to a partition suit filed by Kumar Vamanrao alias Alok, Kumar Vyas alias Prateek, and Aruna (plaintiffs) against Sudheendra (defenda...