Search Results for "appeal scope"

8925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jethabhai Manjibhai Hadiyal, a Talati-cum-Mantri, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 04.03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Hostile Witnesses. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 302, 307, 325, 114 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Kathi Anakbhai Jijibhai, Babubhai Dadabhai Kathi, Aapabhai Amrabhai Kathi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal in Provincial Insolvency Act Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence. The High Court's limited power under Section 75(1) first proviso does not allow disturbing findings of fact, and a wrong decision on facts is according to law.

The appeal arose from insolvency proceedings in which the petitioning creditor sought annulment of two mortgages executed by the insolvents, one for R...