Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Notice Under Section 17(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Violation of Natural Justice. Notice Issued Without Opportunity of Hearing to Land Holder Declared Surplus by SLDT.

The petitioner, Tukaram s/o Dajiba Harkal, a resident of Renakhali, Taluka Pathri, District Parbhani, was the original land holder in proceedings unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Two Writ Petitions Regarding Caste Certificate Validity and Promotion in Municipal Corporation. The Court Considered Whether a Validity Certificate Issued by Nashik Scrutiny Committee After an Earlier Invalidation by Pune Scrutiny Committee Was Valid.

The Bombay High Court heard together two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 7740 of 2008 filed by Date Tanaji Honaji and Writ Petition No. 8696 of 2009...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21.

The writ petition was filed by Mushtaq Moosa Tarani, accused No. 44 in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts trial (Bombay Blast Case No. 1 of 1993), under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Single Judge's Remand Order in Ceiling Surplus Land Cases. Transfers of Land After SLDT Order Held Non-Est, Rule 4 of Maharashtra Agriculture Lands Rules Inapplicable.

The appeals arose from a dispute concerning the determination of surplus agricultural land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband and Family Members in Dowry Harassment Case Filed as Counter-Blast to Civil Suits. Vague and Bald Allegations Against Family Including Elderly Grandmother Deemed Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC.

The marriage between the first petitioner (husband) and the second respondent (wife) took place on 24-10-2020. The relationship turned sour within wee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Shareholders for Alleged Scandalous Allegations in Legal Proceedings. Filing of false cases does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes the court or impedes administration of justice under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), filed a contempt petition against respondent shareholders Sureshchandra V. Par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impounding of Document in Specific Performance Suit — No Objection Raised at Time of Exhibition. Court holds that once a document is exhibited without objection, it cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 at a later stage.

The petitioner, defendant No.4 in Special Civil Suit No.167 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the 8th Jo...