Search Results for "penal consequences"

2270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment to Suicide Case Against ESIC Officers — No Instigation Found. Allegations of Harassment by Colleagues Did Not Meet Threshold of Abetment Under Section 306 IPC Read with Section 107 IPC.

The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against two officers of the Employees ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Domestic Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 307 and 201 IPC for stabbing his wife multiple times with a knife, causing grievous injuries.

The appellant, Arvind S/o Kanjibhai Rajpopat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Extradition Order in Matrimonial Dispute, Dissolves Marriage on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings Filed by Wife Against Husband and In-Laws as Abuse of Process of Law.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had affirmed a trial court order directing extradition of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cross-FIR Case Between Advocates Due to Abuse of Process and Apology. Second FIR Registered as Counterblast to First FIR Was Deemed an Abuse of Law Under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(1) of Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Quashed to End Protracted Litigation.

The appeal arose from a dispute between two advocates practising in Kodaikanal, leading to cross-FIRs registered in December 2017. The first appellant...