Search Results for "multiple charges"

1570 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1570 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences for Convicts in Multiple Criminal Cases Due to Hardship to Family. Court exercises discretion under Section 427 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to direct sentences to run concurrently instead of consecutively.

The petitioners, Navnit Madhukar Naik and his wife Priya Navnit Naik, were convicted in three criminal cases: Regular Criminal Case No. 105 of 2011 (o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.409 of 1999 filed by the accused (Kadar Tolan Bagwan and others) against their conviction under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Concurrency of Sentences in Multiple Convictions for Theft and Forgery. Court holds that Section 427(1) CrPC does not mandate concurrency for distinct transactions and that the trial court's discretion to order consecutive sentences was justified.

The petitioner, Abidkhan @ Salman Mukhtar Khan Pathan, was convicted in three separate criminal cases (C.C. Nos.664/PW/2011, 665/PW/2011, and 666/PW/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband and Mother-in-law in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Absence of Proximate Cause. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death by burns was not proved to be homicidal and no nexus between alleged harassment and death established.

The appellants, Shaikh Juned Shaikh Moti Mansuri (husband) and Julekha Begum (mother-in-law), were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Auranga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the dying declaration was not recorded in the exact words of the deceased and lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Samir Balasaheb Awati, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Salama, and sentenced to life i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Thane to Nagpur on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Wife's Convenience Paramount in Matrimonial Transfer Under Section 24 CPC; Nagpur Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Entire State.

The applicant wife, Mrs. Sayali Kuber, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rioting and Grievous Hurt Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 326 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove individual overt acts and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 18th June 1993 at about 8:00 p.m. in village Panaj, Tahsil Akot, District Akola, where a group of 13-15 persons al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with contradictions, and other witnesses turned hostile.

The appellant, Manohar Gangaram Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Brihan Mumbai, for the murder of his uncle, Kashinath Ramchandr...