Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1974 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1974 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Teacher in Minority Institution Challenging Appointment of Head Master. Management's Right to Appoint Head of School by Nomination Under Section 3(2) of MEPS Act, 1977 Upheld.

The petitioner, Hussain Khan, was a senior lecturer at Shah Babu Urdu Jr. College, Patur, which is a minority institution under Article 30 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by University of Agricultural Sciences in Land Title Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Declaration and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff's Title Not Established and Earlier Injunction Suit Dismissed for Non-Identity of Property.

The case involves a dispute over land measuring 2 acres 20 guntas in Jakkur Plantation, Bangalore. The plaintiff, Smt. Saroja Gupta, claimed to be the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Partly in Fatal Accident Case, Reduces Sentence for Rash Driving. Court holds that conviction under Section 304-A IPC without specific charge is valid if no prejudice, and reduces sentence to period already undergone for young driver with family.

The appellant, Rajkumar Dhunichand Sharma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for offences under Sections 307 and 304-A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....