Search Results for "Kerala Act"

4121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appeal Pertains to Alleged Bribery Demand by State Excise Superintendent for Renewing Liquor License.

The matter involved a criminal appeal under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed by a Superintendent of the State Excise Department at Ratnag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Renewal of Lease Under Article 226 — No Obligation on Collector to Renew Lease in Absence of Statutory or Contractual Right. Lease Renewal Claim Fails as Lease Deed Contained No Covenant for Renewal and Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Enforce Mere Contractual Right.

The petitioners, M/s Redstone Realtors and another, a firm engaged in property development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit, Rejecting Limitation Bar Under Article 137. Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Applications for Amendment of Pleadings, Allowing Defendants to Elaborate Existing Defences.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by defendant nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Suit No. 2256 of 1998 pending before the Bombay High Court. The defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...