Search Results for "shortfall"

362 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 362 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Sharebroker in Time-Barred Claim Dispute. Limitation Period for Quarterly Settlement Runs from End of Quarter Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Mukesh Mansukhbhai Kanani, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal of the National Stock Exchange, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Petition for Pension and Arrears in Service Dispute. Removal for Misconduct Disentitles Employee to Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Kulkarni Shashikant Bhavani, was appointed as a lecturer in Physical Education at B.P.C.A's College of Physical Education (respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Suppression of Facts and Abuse of Process — Arrest of Vessel Set Aside with Return of Security. Plaintiff suppressed filing of proceedings in Hong Kong and China, leading to dismissal of suit and release of security.

The plaintiff, Sinoriches Enterprises Co. Ltd., filed Admiralty Suit No.76 of 2011 in the Bombay High Court seeking a decree and arrest of the vessel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages for Delayed and Undelivered LPG Cylinders. Arbitrator's interpretation of contractual clauses upheld as not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. R.M. Cylinders Private Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 30 August 2010 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Navy Pension Regulation Denying Condonation for Voluntary Discharge. Regulation 82(a) of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 21, 300A as it applies uniformly to sailors discharged at their own request.

The petitioners, six former sailors of the Indian Navy, were discharged from service on compassionate grounds. They had served between 14 and 15 years...