Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Pension Calculation Based on Punishment of Reduction in Salary. Reduction in salary imposed as penalty cannot be used to compute last drawn pay for pension under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Dr. Ramchandra Bapu Nirmale, was a Medical Officer employed with the State of Maharashtra and ESIC from 20 December 1978 to 31 August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Examines Legality of Pension Recovery Conditions Imposed Post-Facto for APMC Employment. Petition Challenges Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal’s Finding that Reemployment Constituted Commercial Employment under Rule 163(8) of Pension Rules.

The petitioner retired from the Maharashtra State Government service on 31.05.1992 and immediately joined as Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Mark...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.

The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Upholding Withholding of Pension. Challenge centres on validity of departmental enquiry initiated post-retirement under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was filed by a retired Revenue Inspector challenging the order of the Karnataka State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Government Servant as Barred by Limitation Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement for Events More Than Four Years Old Held Without Jurisdiction Under Rule 214(2)(b)(ii).

The petitioner, a Junior Engineer in the Mysore City Corporation, challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated after his retirement. He had been ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Claim for Balance Gratuity Under VIIth Pay Commission Ceiling. Petitioner restricted claim to Rs.20 lakh ceiling, already paid Rs.9,76,280, balance Rs.10,23,720 directed to be paid with interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mohammad Modassir, a pensioner and former State Election Commissioner of Goa, filed a writ petition seeking payment of retirement ...