Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2365 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2365 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

7 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Petitioner is Entitled to Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit Under GST Laws. The Court Examines Whether the Petitioner Company Supplying Services to Foreign Group Companies Qualifies as an 'Agent' Under Section 2(5) of CGST Act.

16 Jun 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged two Orders-in-Appeal dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of EMD in Tender Dispute - Petitioner Entitled to Full Refund of Earnest Money Deposit as Forfeiture Without Specific Clause is Unjust Enrichment. The Court directed refund of balance 10% EMD of Rs.12 lakhs as retention without contractual basis is impermissible.

22 Jun 2023

The Petitioner, M/s. API Civilcon Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

10 May 2019

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Challenging Joint Application Requirement for Refund of Court Fees in DRT — Rule 5 of Refund Rules Struck Down as Ultra Vires. The requirement of a joint application by the applicant and defendant for refund of court fees was held arbitrary and beyond the rule-making power under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

9 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Yes Bank Limited, a bank governed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, had advanced a loan to a borrower who defaulted. The bank filed...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Stamp Duty on Unexecuted Instrument Under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Court examines whether payment of stamp duty without execution of an instrument constitutes a valid charge and whether writ jurisdiction can be invoked for refund beyond the statutory limitation period, focusing on the definition of ‘instrument’ under Section 2(l) and the scheme of Sections 47 and 48.

12 Dec 2025

The writ petition raised the question whether the High Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution could be invoked to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Security Deposit Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that the amount was a refundable security deposit and not a loan, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, A. S. Patel Trust and its trustees, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 October 2018 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT — Reassessment Based on Revised Return Under Immunity Scheme Held Invalid Without Proper Examination of Section 143(1) Acceptance. The court held that the Assessing Officer must have independent reasons to believe income escaped assessment, and the revised return under the Immunity Scheme could not be the sole basis for reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

20 Apr 2015

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the assessee, Sri K Nagesh, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, dated 29...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)