SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
Search Results for "customs adjudication"
684 result(s) found
Found 684 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Union of India in Customs Gold Confiscation Case — Confessional Statements Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962 Are Admissible Evidence and Cannot Be Discarded Without Proof of Coercion.
16 Oct 2018The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Petitioner, a Dubai-based Indian, was prosecuted for alleged smuggling of gold bars without prior sanction under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962, rendering the complaint invalid.
13 Mar 2019The petitioner, Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed, was Accused No.2 in CC No.210/2014 pending before the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Dakshina Kannada, Ma...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Informer Seeking Balance Reward Under Customs Informers' Reward Scheme. Customs Department Directed to Pay Balance Reward Amount to Informer Who Provided Information Leading to Revenue Collection.
27 Apr 2015The petitioner, an informer of the Customs Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to release the balance amoun...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Release of Seized Goods in Customs Undervaluation Case — Failure to Respond to Applications Constitutes Dereliction of Statutory Duty. Mandamus issued under Article 226 of Constitution of India directing consideration of application under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962 for provisional release of ball-bearings seized on allegation of undervaluation.
30 Aug 2023The Petitioner, RKZB International, a proprietorship concern of Smt. Rizu Kalra, imported ball-bearings under Bill of Entry No.5681804 dated 2nd Octob...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Confiscation Order for Used Haemodialysis Machines — Import Not Prohibited Under Hazardous Waste Rules. Used Medical Equipment Not Classifiable as 'Hazardous Waste' or 'Waste' Under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-Boundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
30 Jul 2024The petitioner, Hemant Surgical Industries Limited, is engaged in importing, manufacturing, and supplying medical equipment. Since 2008, it has import...
- 413
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.
20 Feb 2026The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...
- 194
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Customs Licence for Export Oriented Unit Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Licence under Section 58(1) of Customs Act, 1962 cancelled without proper show cause notice and without considering reply, set aside with restoration of licence.
22 Jul 2022The petitioner, Sarla Performance Fibers Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of synthetic yarn...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Customs Show Cause Notices for Alleged Under-Invoicing of Imported Printing Machinery. Denial of Inspection of Documents Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Customs Act, 1962.
8 Dec 2005The petitioners, M/s. Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and its subsidiaries, imported printing machinery and photo composing equipment fro...
- 93
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Demand Notice Issued to Former Director for Recovery of Company's Customs Dues. Director Not Personally Liable for Tax Arrears Under Section 142 of Customs Act, 1962, Absent Statutory Provision.
15 Feb 2019The case involved a writ petition filed by Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old former director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later known as PDG Infotec...
