Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Customs Show Cause Notices for Alleged Under-Invoicing of Imported Printing Machinery. Denial of Inspection of Documents Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Customs Act, 1962.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and its subsidiaries, imported printing machinery and photo composing equipment from M/s. Linotype Associates Pvt. Ltd., United Kingdom during 1981-1983. In 1987, the Customs department issued two show cause notices dated 19-20th October, 1987 and 11th December, 1987 alleging under-invoicing in the price of the imported machinery. The petitioners replied on 29th January, 1988 seeking time to file further reply and inspection of certain documents. They also mentioned that other newspapers like Times of India, Hindustan Times, Ananda Bazar Patrika, and Statesman had imported identical equipment from the same manufacturer. The respondents sent a further letter on 9th June, 1988. The petitioners challenged the show cause notices by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court considered whether the denial of inspection of documents relied upon by the department violated principles of natural justice. The court held that the show cause notices were issued without providing the petitioners an opportunity to inspect the documents, which is a fundamental requirement of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the show cause notices and directed the respondents to provide inspection of the documents before issuing fresh notices, if any.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Show Cause Notice - Natural Justice - Denial of Inspection - The petitioners imported printing machinery and were issued show cause notices alleging under-invoicing. The petitioners sought inspection of documents relied upon by the department, which was denied. The court held that denial of inspection of documents relied upon in the show cause notice violates principles of natural justice and the notices are liable to be quashed. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the show cause notices issued by the Customs department alleging under-invoicing in import of printing machinery are liable to be quashed on the ground that the petitioners were denied inspection of documents relied upon by the department, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notices dated 19-20th October, 1987 and 11th December, 1987. The respondents were directed to provide inspection of the documents to the petitioners before issuing fresh show cause notices, if any.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to inspection of documents
  • Customs Act
  • 1962
  • Show cause notice
  • Under-invoicing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (12) 14

WRIT PETITION NO.3102 OF 1989

2005-12-08

H.L. Gokhale, J.P. Devadhar

D.D. Madon (senior advocate) with Vinayak Shete i/b. Poorvi Kamani for petitioners; S.S. Pakale with S.M. Shah for respondents

M/s. Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Indian Express (Madurai) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Andraprabha Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India, H. Narayanrao, Collector of Customs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging show cause notices issued by Customs department alleging under-invoicing in import of printing machinery.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of show cause notices dated 19-20th October, 1987 and 11th December, 1987.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were denied inspection of documents relied upon by the Customs department in the show cause notices, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the show cause notices are liable to be quashed for denial of inspection of documents.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were denied inspection of documents relied upon by the department, which is a violation of natural justice. Respondents argued that the show cause notices were valid and the petitioners had adequate opportunity to respond.

Ratio Decidendi

Denial of inspection of documents relied upon in a show cause notice violates principles of natural justice, rendering the notice liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners sent their reply to the notices on 29th January, 1988 seeking time to file further reply and seek inspection of certain documents. The court held that denial of inspection of documents relied upon in the show cause notice violates principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

Show cause notices issued in 1987; petitioners replied in 1988; writ petition filed in 1989; judgment delivered on 8th December, 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Non-Compliance of Order in Land Dispute. Court holds that subsequent compliance and filing of fresh writ petition render contempt proceedings infructuous.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation decision renders declaration of...