Search Results for "agricultural produce marketing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "agricultural produce marketing"

230 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

30 Jan 2026

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Year-Round Operation of Procurement Centres for MSP. Court holds that procurement operations are policy decisions based on seasonal harvest cycles and cannot be directed by courts under Article 226.

28 May 2025

The petitioner, Rait Sena Karnataka, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Special Land Acquisition Officer to Determine Compensation for Land Acquired for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Compromise Terms Binding on Parties. The court held that the SLAO must pass a fresh award as per the compromise recorded in Writ Petition No. 2285 of 1992, failing which the petitioners could seek additional compensation in civil court.

19 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Radhabai wd/o Purushottam Mallawat and Ashish s/o Purushottam Mallawat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notifications Requiring Licenses for Hamals and Transporters in APMCs Under APMC Act. The Court held that the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 does not empower the State to require licenses for hamals and transporters, and upheld the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Essential Services Maintenance Act, 2021.

29 Jun 2021

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various transport companies, hamal unions, and cooperative societies challenging Government R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Members Due to Availability of Alternative Statutory Remedy Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Nomination and Counting Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction and Directed Petitioners to Avail Election Petition Remedy.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioners, who were candidates in the election for members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Kamptee, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Against Labour Court Order Granting Benefits Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Held That Computation of Benefits Under Section 33C(2) Cannot Be Based on Prior Adjudication of Entitlement Which Was Not Finally Decided.

28 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Gondia, challenged the judgment and order dated 15/11/2010 passed by the Labour Court in Referen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of APMC Managing Committee Term Under Section 14(3) of Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The Court held that the State Government's power to extend the term of a managing committee is statutory and does not require prior consultation, and the petitioner had no locus standi to challenge the order.

20 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Ashok s/o Parlhadrao Thakre, a member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Digras, filed a writ petition challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility to Contest APMC Election Despite Election Being Held, Holds That Deletion of Rule 88 Does Not Bar Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court set aside the order declaring respondent no.2 eligible to contest the election and directed rejection of his nomination papers, as the alternate remedy of election petition under Rule 88 of the APMC Rules was deleted.

23 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Sadashivrao Ganpatrao Mahajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagp...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)