Search Results for "adhoc committee"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Municipal Workers Challenging Reversion to Original Posts. Corporation's action of reverting Safai Kamgars who worked as clerks for years held illegal without following principles of natural justice and without considering the 2005 Resolution.

The Bombay High Court allowed a group of writ petitions filed by employees of Bhiwandi Nizampura City Municipal Corporation challenging their reversio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Head Master Reverted to Assistant Teacher Due to Invalid Appointment Without Prior Approval. Appointment as Head Master Without Education Officer's Approval Invalid Under Section 7 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The appellant, Somsingh Chandrasingh Thakur, was an Assistant Teacher at Captain R.M. Oak School, a Marathi medium school run by Balak Mandir Sanstha....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a chance witness with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The appellants, Mahendra Madansingh Thakur and Dinesh @ Guddu Pratapsingh Thakur, were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao @ Anil Baban Kharade and Vijay Hiraman Bahare, were convicted by the adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay at Sewre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate and Absence of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Intent to Humiliate Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) by the 1st Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Baramati, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Election for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article 226. Election Dispute Must Be Raised by Election Petition Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

The petitioner, Jagannath Gawaji Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Grievous Hurt in Domestic Violence Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Medical Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 326 IPC.

The appellant, Babu Kunchankuch Vagalil, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai at Sewree in Sessions Case No.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reversion of Family Court Employees in Service Law Case — Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules Are Void. Court Held That Appointments to Promoted Posts Must Be Made in Accordance with Statutory Rules and Not Merely on Administrative Orders.

The petitioners were employees of the Family Court, Mumbai, who had been promoted to higher posts such as Cashier, Shirestedar, and Assistant Shireste...