Search Results for "Sole Respondent"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Sole Respondent"

7640 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7640 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Remand Order for Further Evidence Upheld. Court holds that appellate arbitral tribunal's directions for further evidence are within its powers and do not constitute a final determination of rights under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Dec 2014

The case involves a dispute between ANS Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner), a registered stock broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange, and Mr. Jayesh R. Ajmera (resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court holds that arbitrator erred in rejecting claim for interest on delayed payment of compensation and in not awarding solatium under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

21 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Kekobad Dossabhoy Doongriwalla and Khorshed Navzar Wadia, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Writ Petition on Tender Disqualification of Consortium with Proprietary Lead Member. Court Examines Whether RFP Clauses Required All Consortium Members to be Companies Under Companies Act, 2013.

26 Jun 2023

Background: The dispute arose from a tender process initiated by Mormugao Port Authority (Respondent No.1) for the operation and maintenance of Intern...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

9 Mar 2006

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

20 Oct 2016

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Variation of Consent Order in Copyright Dispute Over Music Videos. Denial of opportunity to file reply before modifying consent order violates principles of natural justice.

3 Jul 2021

The Appellant, Aman Chhabra, filed a commercial suit against the Respondents concerning the copyright of two music videos, 'Pyar To Na Kaho' and 'Lutt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Determines Factual Enquiry Whether Share Transfer Resulted in Members Exceeding Fifty. Enquiry Directed by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014 Following Dispute Over Validity of Pre-emption Rights in Articles of Association.

4 Aug 2017

The appeal was placed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay following a remand order by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014. Th...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)