Search Results for "Rule 273"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 273"

628 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 628 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Homestay Owner in Sexual Assault Case Involving Foreign National; Declares Arrest Illegal and Awards Compensation. Arrest Under Non-Cognizable Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Without Cognizable Offence or Proper Procedure Held Violative of Fundamental Rights.

15 Jul 2026

Background: The petitioner, Palecanda Ponnappa @ Vishal, the owner of Devi Villa Homestay in Kodagu district, was arrested in connection with an alleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Son's Challenge Against Impleadment of Parents in Property Suit — Order Directing Addition of Parents as Parties Set Aside. Court holds that parents have no independent right to be impleaded in son's suit for possession against third parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

18 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Parag Prakash Mutha, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 January 2022 passed by the 7th Additional Judge, Small Causes...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Vested Rights Not Affected by Amendment. State Cannot Withdraw Exemption Granted Under Section 8(5) of CST Act for Inter-State Sales Prior to 2002 Amendment.

10 Feb 2025

The case involves appeals by the State of Maharashtra against a High Court judgment that quashed trade circulars and notices issued by the Sales Tax D...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. The petitions sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Karnataka BDA Act, 1976 regarding Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Without Considering Merits and Without Granting Personal Hearing Set Aside.

24 Feb 2022

The petitioners, Dinesh Bhabootmal Salecha and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Settlemen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

9 Jun 2014

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Possession of Gutka for Sale Under Section 273 IPC — Gutka Not an Article of Food. Possession of Gutka for sale does not constitute an offence under Section 273 IPC as Gutka is not an article of food under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

26 Feb 2010

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners, who were accused of possessing Gutka for sale, which was alleged to be an offe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Winding Up Petition to NCLT Despite Admission Order. Discretion Under Section 434(1)(c) Companies Act, 2013 Properly Exercised Where Liquidation Was at Initial Stage and No Irreversible Steps Taken.

14 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. against the Delhi High Court's order transferring a winding up petition to the...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)