Search Results for "Goa Land Use Act 1991"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Goa Land Use Act 1991"

185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Environmental Clearance for Vadhavan Port Project — Upholds Validity of CRZ Clearance and Public Hearing Process. The court held that the Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority had jurisdiction to grant CRZ clearance and that the public hearing was conducted in accordance with law.

18 Apr 2024

The judgment concerns two public interest litigations (PILs) filed by Conservation Action Trust and Debi Goenka, and by National Fishworkers Forum and...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme for Koli Fisherfolk Community — No Locus Standi Found as Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Interest in the Subject Land. The Court Held That the Petitioners, Being Societies Not Directly Affected by the Development, Could Not Maintain a Public Interest Litigation for Alleged Violations of CRZ Norms and Fisheries Act.

16 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Danda Koli Masemari Vyavasayik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and Danda Koli Samaj, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay H...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Mining Leases in Ecologically Sensitive Dodamarg Taluka, Upholding Environmental Clearances and Rejecting Allegations of Procedural Violations. The court held that the environmental clearance granted to mining leases in Dodamarg Taluka, Sindhudurg district, was valid and not in violation of the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, and that the area was not declared an eco-sensitive zone under the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two public interest litigations filed by environmental NGOs Awaaz Foundation and Vanashakti challenging mining leases granted in...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC — Appellant Entitled to Possession Despite Third Party Claimant's Alleged Independent Title. Executing Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Going Behind Decree for Specific Performance; Third Party Must File Separate Suit to Establish Title.

18 Aug 2005

The appellant, Sujata Sanzgiry, entered into an agreement for sale dated 5th August 1989 with respondent No.1, Ankush R. Naik, for the purchase of Fla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

7 May 2026

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

High Court

High Court Directs Coastal Zone Authority to Decide on Mangrove Cutting for High-Speed Rail Project. Court Holds That Expert Bodies Must First Determine Larger Public Interest Before Permitting Destruction of Mangroves Under Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011.

9 Dec 2022

The writ petition arose from a decision of the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) deferring permission for the National High Speed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.

6 May 2011

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for lack of security clearance from the Defence Department as required for constructions near military installations.

29 Apr 2016

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the Union of India through the Indian Army seeking a mandamus to restrain the St...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)