Search Results for "Deepak Kumar"

950 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 950 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Promise-to-Marry Rape Case — Lack of Evidence of False Promise. Consent Based on Promise to Marry Not Vitiated When Promise Was Not False from Inception Under Section 376 IPC.

The applicant, Rajesh Sankarsan Tripathy, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in PMLA Case Due to Long Incarceration and Delayed Trial. Prolonged custody without trial violates Article 21; twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA not an absolute bar.

The applicant, Vijay Narendra Kumar Kothari, filed a bail application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Framing of Charges in Sexual Assault Case — Reiterates Limited Scope of Section 227/228 CrPC at Charge-Framing Stage

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Tarun Jit Tejpal against the judgment of the Bombay High Court at Goa, which had refused to discharge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 454 Cr.P.C. for Return of Seized Property to Acquitted Accused. Court holds that acquitted persons are entitled to return of seized property unless required for any other proceedings.

The present appeal was filed under Section 454(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order dated 21.01.2010 passed by the Fast T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Housing Board Due to Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Delay in Publication and Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.202 measuring 18 acres, challenged the acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnataka a...