Search Results for "Comparable Instance"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Gondwakadi Tank Project — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare with Statutory Benefits. Court Relies on Previous Awards for Comparable Lands Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a common judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pandharkawada in Land Acquisition Case No. 205...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Evidence for Enhanced Market Value. Claimants Failed to Prove Market Value Through Comparable Sales or Reliable Expert Evidence, Resulting in Restoration of Original Compensation.

The appeal was filed by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the enhancemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Rate of Rs.7 per sq m Upheld. Reference Court's rejection of enhancement claim affirmed as appellants failed to prove market value higher than awarded.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the legal representatives of Vaikunth Gopinath Poi Panandikar (since deceased) against the judgment and award ...