Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case - Cess Under Textile Committees Act Not Part of CVD. Cess under Section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is not includable in Countervailing Duty under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 for exemption purposes.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Limited, a manufacturer of yarn, imported capital goods (textile machinery) under bills of entry dated 28t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Travel Agencies in Service Tax Export Case — Services Rendered to Foreign Clients Abroad Constitute Export of Service Under Finance Act, 1994. Extended Period of Limitation Under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Invoked Without Suppression or Fraud.

The Madras High Court allowed two appeals filed by M/s. Translanka Air Travels Pvt Ltd and M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt Ltd against orders of the Custom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — Confiscation of Indian Currency Not Sustainably Linked to Smuggling. CESTAT's finding that Revenue failed to establish necessary ingredients for invoking Section 121 of Customs Act, 1962 upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai filed an appeal against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...