Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 159
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 under the Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate (DEEC) Scheme. On 20.08.2003, the appellant requested conversion of these DEEC Shipping Bills to Drawback Shipping Bills, citing inability to utilize the Advance License issued against the export products for import of duty-free raw material. The Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Nagpur, denied the conversion by order dated 10.02.2011, relying on CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 dated 16.01.2004, which permits such conversion only when the benefit under the DEEC Scheme is denied by the DGFT or Customs Authorities. The appellant appealed to the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), which upheld the Commissioner's order on 12.05.2014. The appellant then filed the present appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The sole issue argued was whether denial of DEEC benefit is a prerequisite for conversion. The High Court heard arguments from both sides. The appellant's counsel contended that the Circular should be interpreted liberally, but the court found that the Circular clearly requires a denial of DEEC benefit, which did not occur. The court noted that the goods were examined, value verified, and clearance allowed under DEEC Scheme; the appellant's inability to utilize the license does not constitute denial. The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the orders of the Commissioner and CESTAT.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Conversion of Shipping Bill - DEEC to Drawback - CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 dated 16.01.2004 - Requirement of Denial - The appellant sought conversion of DEEC Shipping Bills to Drawback Shipping Bills claiming inability to utilize Advance License. The Commissioner and CESTAT denied conversion as the Circular permits conversion only when benefit under DEEC Scheme is denied by DGFT or Customs Authorities. The High Court upheld the denial, holding that mere inability to utilize the license does not amount to denial of DEEC benefit. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC Scheme to Drawback Scheme is permissible under CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 when the benefit under DEEC Scheme has not been denied by DGFT or Customs Authorities.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the orders of the Commissioner and CESTAT. The court held that conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC Scheme to Drawback Scheme is not permissible under CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 as the benefit under DEEC Scheme was not denied by DGFT or Customs Authorities.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 dated 16.01.2004
  • Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC Scheme to Drawback Scheme
  • Requirement of denial of DEEC benefit
  • Section 130 of Customs Act
  • 1962
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (01) 145

Customs Appeal No. 1 of 2014

2016-01-05

B.P. Dharmadhikari, P.N. Deshmukh

Shri Varun Sinha with Shri Nitin Rode for appellant; Shri A. Deshpande for respondent No. 2

Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., through its Director Mrs. Bhawana Manawat

1. The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai; 2. The Commissioner Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 against order of CESTAT denying conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC Scheme to Drawback Scheme.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought conversion of DEEC Shipping Bills to Drawback Shipping Bills to avail export benefit.

Filing Reason

Appellant claimed inability to utilize Advance License issued against export products for import of duty-free raw material.

Previous Decisions

Commissioner of Customs denied conversion on 10.02.2011; CESTAT upheld denial on 12.05.2014.

Issues

Whether conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC Scheme to Drawback Scheme is permissible under CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 when DEEC benefit has not been denied by DGFT or Customs.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Circular should be interpreted liberally and that inability to utilize the Advance License should be treated as denial of DEEC benefit. Respondent argued that the Circular clearly requires denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs, which did not occur.

Ratio Decidendi

Under CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 dated 16.01.2004, conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC Scheme to Drawback Scheme is permissible only when the benefit under DEEC Scheme is denied by DGFT or Customs Authorities. Mere inability to utilize the Advance License does not constitute such denial.

Judgment Excerpts

The CESTAT in the impugned order mentions that the Commissioner denied the conversion as CBEC Circular No. 4 of 2004 dated 16.01.2004 permitted such conversion only when benefit under Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate Scheme (DEEC Scheme) is denied by DGFT/ Ministry of Commerce or Customs Authorities. Thus, only limited issue argued before this Court by the appellant is whether such denial is really necessary.

Procedural History

Appellant exported goods under DEEC Scheme in August-September 2002. On 20.08.2003, appellant requested conversion to Drawback Scheme. Commissioner denied conversion on 10.02.2011. Appellant appealed to CESTAT, which upheld denial on 12.05.2014. Appellant then filed the present appeal under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. High Court reserved judgment on 30.10.2015 and pronounced on 05.01.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: 130
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that once the cheque and signature are admitted, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt...