Search Results for "Article 219"

464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 75% Deposit Under Section 21 of RDB Act in Debt Recovery Appeal — No Waiver Granted as Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case or Financial Hardship.

The petitioner, M/s. Sterlite Technologies Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Debts Recover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...