Search Results for "additional fee"

1993 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1993 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Female Heir in Hindu Succession Dispute — Prior Partition and Sale by Coparcener Barred Claim. Daughter of Predeceased Son Had No Vested Right During Lifetime of Absolute Owner; Rule of Survivorship Inapplicable After Partition.

The appellant, Radha Bai, filed a suit for partition and possession of ancestral land in Village Barra, claiming to be the daughter of Saheblal, a pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Tender for Construction of Commercial Complex in Thane. Court holds that no public interest is involved as the petition is filed by business rivals to scuttle a tender process.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) and three other indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners' Challenge to Section 6(1) Notification Fails Due to Delay, Laches, and Existence of Alternative Remedy.

The petitioners, who are residents and agriculturists of Mahalunge, Taluka-Mulshi, District Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Sub-Registrar in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohan Bhaiyyalal Shrivastava, was a Sub-Registrar at Barshitakli, Akola. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Akola in Special Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Election Programme After Notification Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Shamrao Narhari Pavale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election process of the Agricultural Produc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...