Search Results for "contract enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "contract enforcement"

1695 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1695 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse and Subsequent Possession Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Held that Once Acquisition Lapses, Possession Cannot Be Retained Without Fresh Proceedings.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Golatgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside Eviction Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The MRT lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Tahsildar's eviction order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and the appeal was barred by limitation.

3 Feb 2020

The petitioners, original tenants of the disputed land, challenged the decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 26.04.1996, which allo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Maintainability Challenge Rejected. Division Bench Holds That Writ Petition Under Article 226 Is Maintainable Despite Availability of Revision, and That a Division Bench Has Jurisdiction to Hear Such Petitions.

23 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mr. Nusli Neville Wadia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applicant in Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Party Cannot Enforce Arbitration Clause in Agreement Whose Existence It Denies. The court held that a party cannot enforce an arbitration clause in an agreement whose existence it denies, as the arbitration clause is part of the agreement and cannot be severed for enforcement when the agreement itself is repudiated.

6 Aug 2010

The applicant, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

8 Jun 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows LIC Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Temporary Daily Wage Workers — Workers Who Participated in Selection Process and Were Not Selected Cannot Claim Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

13 Apr 2005

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal dated 28 February 2002, which held tha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging EPF Attachment Over SFC Sale Property. Section 11(2) of EPF Act, 1952 creates overriding first charge on assets, enforceable against purchaser in SFC sale, not limited to insolvency or winding up.

28 Mar 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Agro Products, was a purchaser in a sale conducted by the State Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Seeking Recovery of Interim Wage Order Under Section 50 of MRTU & PULP Act. Section 50 Recovery Only Available for Final Orders Under Chapter VI, Not Interim Orders Under Section 30.

18 Jul 2006

The petitioner, a trade union registered under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU &...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prohibitory Order Against Contractor in EPF Recovery Proceedings — Third Party Debtor Cannot Be Restrained Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 8G of EPF Act. The court held that a prohibitory order under Section 8G of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires prior determination of the debt owed by the third party to the employer, and cannot be issued solely on the basis of a recovery certificate against the employer.

18 Nov 2025

The petitioner, B.T. Kadlag Constructions, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

126 127 128 129 130

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)