Search Results for "invalid notification"

1392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Structure Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation's Order Declaring Structure Unauthorized Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Show Valid Title or Sanctioned Plan.

The petitioner, Mubaraz Musafir Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17-A of Prevention of Corruption Act. Amendment requiring prior approval for investigation applies to chargesheets filed after its commencement.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nagpur, filed a criminal application challenging an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tribal Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal of Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions for Sale of Tribal Land.

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, owned land in Valshind, Thane. He sought to sell the land to respondent No. 6, a non-tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...