Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1597 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1597 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Condoning Delay of 129 Days in Arbitration Petition. Benefit of Section 14 of Limitation Act Extended as Earlier Filing in Delhi Court Was Bona Fide Despite Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction.

25 Jan 2017

The dispute arose from an arbitral award passed on 25 February 2014. The respondent, Globe Capital Market Ltd., challenged the award by filing an arbi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

11 Sep 2023

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...

High Court

High Court Quashes Termination of Railway Contract as Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Writ Petition Maintainable Despite Arbitration Clause Under Article 226 of Constitution of India, as Termination Notices Dated 13.11.2025 and 02.12.2025 Were Issued Without Adequate Hearing and With Sufficient Time Remaining for Completion.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a registered partnership firm, Petitioner, challenging the termination of its contract with Central Railway authorities for const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Demurrage and Other Charges — Amendment Sought to Include Additional Claims and Correct Description of Vessel. Court Held That Amendment Does Not Introduce New Cause of Action and Is Necessary for Determination of Real Controversy.

30 Nov -0001

The present application was filed by the plaintiff, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, seeking amendment of the plaint in a commercial suit for recovery ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Management Agreement Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. The court upheld the award of damages for wrongful termination of a hotel management agreement, finding the arbitrator's interpretation and assessment of damages to be plausible and not perverse.

12 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Laguna Resort Private Limited (formerly Hasina Resort Pvt. Ltd.), owned land in Lonavala and planned to develop a hotel. On 27 Septemb...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 9, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition sought appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of property in a commercial dispute.

16 Apr 2025

The petitioner, SJK Buildcon LLP, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Hig...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

25 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2019

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Group Mediclaim Dispute — Lack of Jurisdiction and No Merit Found. The District Court at Pune lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the seat of arbitration was Mumbai, and the insurer failed to appear before the arbitrator despite notice.

27 Nov 2018

The case involves a challenge by United India Insurance Company Ltd. (the petitioner) against an arbitral award passed in favor of Kalyani Avinash Gok...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declines Section 11 Jurisdiction, Holds Calcutta High Court Appropriate When Earlier Section 9 Application Filed Before City Civil Court, Kolkata. The Court applies Ravi Ranjan principle, holding that the High Court exercising supervisory jurisdiction over the district court first moved under the Act is the correct Section 11 court, even if the parties' agreement confers jurisdiction on another High Court.

12 Jun 2025

The case arose from loan agreements between Tata Motors Finance Solution Ltd (now merged into Tata Capital Limited) and Parbez Hamid, containing arbit...

121 122 123 124 125

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)