High Court of Bombay Decides Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 9, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition sought appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of property in a commercial dispute.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, SJK Buildcon LLP, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Bombay, seeking appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of certain property, presumably in connection with a dispute. The matter was heard by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan on April 8, 2025, and the judgment was pronounced on April 16, 2025. The judgment excerpt indicates that the petition was filed in a templated format. The nature of the underlying dispute and the court's decision are not fully available from the provided text.

Issue of Consideration

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 20834 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 62

CARBPL-20834-2024

2025-04-16

Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.

Mayur Khandeparkar, Sarthak Utangale, M/s. Utangale & Co. (for Petitioner); Abhishek Kothari, Rishabh Botadra (for Respondent Nos.1 & 2)

SJK Buildcon LLP

Kusum Pandurang Keni & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of property

Judgment Excerpts

This is yet another templated Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) seeking appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Cheating Case Involving Public Servant Presentation of False Bill for Payment. Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld as Offence Committed by Public Servant Purporting to Act in Official Capacity, and Special Cour...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Trial of Accused Under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Provisions — Jurisdiction Affirmed.