Search Results for "basic requirements"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "basic requirements"

2285 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2285 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Evidence of Demand for Dowry or Harassment Soon Before Death. Court upholds acquittal under Sections 304B, 498A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 as prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients.

27 Jan 2020

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Suresh Sakharam Sawant and his wife Kunda @ Sushma Suresh Sawant (respondents/accuse...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. The court upheld the trial and appellate courts' decisions that the plaintiffs were co-owners of the suit property and that the sale deed executed by the defendants was void for lack of consideration and non-compliance with legal requirements.

3 Mar 2020

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants (defendants 15 and 16 in the original suit) against the judgment and decree of the first app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

6 Nov 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside International Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Seat of Arbitration in London, Not Mumbai. The court held that Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only to arbitrations seated in India, and since the arbitration clause specified London as the seat with English law, Indian courts have no jurisdiction.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, J. S. Ocean Liners Inc., a US company, entered into a Charter Party contract with the respondent, S.K. Shipping (Singapore) Pte Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Section 80IA Deduction Case for Container Handling Cranes. Leasing of cranes to JNPT does not constitute developing, maintaining and operating an infrastructural facility under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

15 Feb 2010

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Deduction Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Insurance Claim and Sundry Receipts Held Not Directly Related to Business Profits, Rental Income Treated as Business Income, Retrenchment Compensation Held Revenue Expenditure.

18 Jun 2010

The case pertains to an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Duty Evasion Case. Petitioner, a 100% EOU, cleared goods to DTA without permission and duty payment, leading to demand of Rs. 33,96,718/-.

10 Aug 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Viva Herba Pvt. Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing vegetable extracts, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Magnetite Powder Price. The court held that triable issues existed but the defendant's defence was not wholly bona fide, warranting security under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

5 Jan 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 38,89,674.14 filed by the plaintiff (M/s. Parijat Enterprises...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Out Pleadings in Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Triable Issue — False Affidavit Allegations Under Section 33A of Representation of People Act, 1951. The court held that vague allegations of false or incomplete affidavit without specifying details do not disclose a cause of action and are liable to be struck off under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC.

17 Feb 2011

The judgment pertains to an application filed by the original respondent in an election petition seeking to strike out certain paragraphs from the pet...

120 121 122 123 124

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)