WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024
19 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "arbitrary date"
5523 result(s) found
Found 5523 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Bond Obligation for Super-Speciality Doctors in Public Medical Colleges — Service Condition and Penalty Valid Under Article 226. Doctors Who Completed D.M./M.Ch. Courses Must Serve Two Years or Pay Rs.25 Lakhs Penalty as Per Government Resolution Dated 8 February 2008.
7 Nov 2012The petitioners, comprising 62 doctors in the first petition and 69 in the second, were doctors who had either completed or were pursuing super-specia...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reduction of Term of District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor. Amendment reducing term from three years to one year held valid; no vested right to continue for full term.
25 Mar 2015The petitioner, Vikas Baburao Patil Shirgaonkar, was appointed as District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor at Satara on 6th August 2014 for a...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Wage Hike for Mathadi Workers. The court held that the Mathadi Board's wage increase was not arbitrary and the Board had not failed in its duty to ensure full utilization of workers under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers' (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969.
1 Oct 2015The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Ltd., a government company, challenged an order dated 12/08/2011 passed by the Nagpur and Wardha District Mat...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for In-service Candidates in Postgraduate Medical Courses — State Government's Policy of Granting Weightage to In-service Candidates for 50% of Seats in Government Medical Colleges Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution.
29 Jul 2016The petitioners, who were candidates for admission to postgraduate medical courses in Maharashtra, challenged the State Government's policy of grantin...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Retention and Transfer Orders in BESCOM Employee Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Seniority Rights. Petitioner's Transfer and Retention of Junior Colleague Set Aside as Arbitrary and Contrary to Established Service Rules.
10 Nov 2021The petitioner, Sri D. Naveen, an Assistant Engineer (Electrical) with BESCOM, challenged two orders: (1) Annexure-J dated 12.3.2021, which retained t...
- 77
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Forfeiture for Breach of Grant Condition. Transfer of Granted Land Without Prior Permission Void Under Section 65 of Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.
3 Mar 2026The present writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Shamjibhai Laljibhai Koli (Gohil) challenging the order dated...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Technical Bid in Tender Process — Shareholding in Defaulter Company Not a Valid Ground for Disqualification Without Prior Notice or Opportunity. The court held that rejection of a bid based on past shareholding in a defaulter company, without giving an opportunity to explain, is arbitrary and unsustainable.
19 Jul 2017The petitioner, Ganesh Vishal Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of the respondent no.1, Mormugao Port Trust, rejecting its technica...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension of Employee for Sexual Harassment in Air India — Two-Day Suspension with Subsistence Allowance Upheld as Proportionate Punishment. The court held that the punishment of two days suspension for sexual harassment was not shockingly disproportionate and the disciplinary proceedings were not vitiated.
15 Nov 2017The petitioner, T.S. Kolhatkar, an employee of Air India, challenged an order dated 23.12.2002 imposing a punishment of suspension for two days on los...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Government Resolution on Grant-in-Aid for Educational Institutions — Government Resolution dated 30-04-2009 Quashed as Unconstitutional and Arbitrary. The court held that the resolution violated Article 14 and interfered with the right to establish and administer educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 26.
8 Oct 2018The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various educational societies and institutions in Maharashtra challenging the Government R...
- 105
