KAHC010100302020_1
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...
Search Results for "Infrastructure"
2410 result(s) found
Found 2410 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Karwar Port Expansion Over SEIAA Authority and Consent Deficiencies. Petitions by Fishermen Associations Raise Category A Project and Pollution Control Compliance Issues Under EIA Notification.
29 Jul 2021Two public interest litigations were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging...
- 68
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Hospital's Writ Petition in Covaxin Supply Dispute, Holding Contractual Disputes Between Private Entities Not Amenable to Article 226 Despite Government Funding and Public Interest. Private Agreement Between Hospital and Vaccine Manufacturer Found to Lack Public Law Element; Arbitration Clause in Supply Agreement Upheld.
6 Dec 2022The petitioner, M/s. United Brothers Healthcare Services Pvt. Ltd. through its unit United Hospital, a 50-bed super specialty hospital in Bengaluru, e...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.
24 Dec 2014The four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by importers of alloy steel deformed bars/reinforcement bars challen...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).
3 Apr 2019The case involved three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a Resolution date...
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.
4 Oct 2022The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SDO's Compensation Order in Transmission Line Dispute; Rules that Telegraph Authority Alone Has Jurisdiction Under Telegraph Act. Transmission Licensee Constituted as Telegraph Authority Under Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003 Holds Exclusive Power to Determine Compensation Under Section 10(d) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and General Circulars Cannot Override.
7 Dec 2023The writ petition was filed by Maharashtra Eastern Grid Power Transmission Company Ltd., a transmission licensee, challenging an order dated 05/09/201...
- 47
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Landowners' Appeals in Land Acquisition for Upper Krishna Project Rehabilitation Township. Acquisition of 1275 Acres for Rehabilitation of Displaced Persons Upheld as Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Judicial Review Under Article 226 Limited to Arbitrariness or Violation of Statute.
20 Jul 2022The writ appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the common judgment and order dated 10.12.2021 passed b...
- 83
High Court
Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking to quash CBI FIR for disproportionate assets under Prevention of Corruption Act; the court examined the scope of Section 13 and the effect of investigation delay. Final outcome not available in the provided excerpt.
19 Oct 2023The writ petition was filed by a sitting MLA and former Minister of Karnataka, who challenged the FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigatio...
- 92
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.
27 Jul 2023Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...
- 77
