Search Results for "tribunal order set aside"

8587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Revisionary Authority on Jurisdiction Ground. Cause of Action Arises at Place of Revisionary Authority's Office Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Not Where Original Adjudication Order Was Passed.

The Bombay High Court dealt with a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of six writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Remand to Appellate Tribunal in Stage Carriage Permit Dispute under Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. High Court's direction to rehear all appeals arising from a single tainted appellate order is valid to prevent public inconvenience.

The dispute arose from the grant of a stage carriage permit on the route Kumbakonam to Neiveli. The Regional Transport Authority, South Arcot, granted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against CCI's Investigation Order in Competition Act Case. Broadcasters Challenge Order Under Section 26(1) Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Application of Mind.

Star India Private Limited and Sony Pictures Network India Private Limited filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 July 2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...