Search Results for "recruitment policy"

868 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 868 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Minimum Qualifying Marks in Recruitment Process. Amendment to Important Instruction Notified After Preliminary Exam Held Not Applicable to Ongoing Selection Where Interview Yet to Be Conducted.

The petitioners, Chiragkumar Dashratlal Patel and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging District Judge Recruitment Notification for Lack of PwD Reservation. Court Directs Compliance with 3% Reservation for Persons with Disabilities in Future Selections Under Section 33 of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

The petitioner, M. Ponniah, who suffers from locomotive disability due to polio, filed a writ petition challenging the notification dated 01.05.2013 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Absorption of Reserved Panel Candidate After Panel Expiry. Direction to absorb respondent as Technician in All India Radio set aside as it violated Recruitment Rules and the limited right of a candidate in a reserved panel.

The Union of India and All India Radio appealed against a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court's direction to absorb the respondent, as a Technic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation Policy for Principal Posts in Aided Colleges. Post of Principal is an Isolated Post Not Subject to Reservation Under Maharashtra Reservation Policy.

The petitioner, Marathwada Legal and General Education Society, runs two aided colleges: Manikchand Pahade Law College (established 1956) and Dr. (Smt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.

The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Divergence on Reservation Act and Promotion Policy — Constitutional Validity Issue Deemed Academic. Third Judge Holds that Tribunal Overstepped in Striking Down Reservation Act as the Core Dispute Concerned Promotion Quotas, Not Direct Recruitment Reservations.

The matter originated from a reference by the Chief Justice under Rule 7, Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, necessitated by a d...