Search Results for "postponement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "postponement"

195 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 195 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Civil Court Order Allowing Filing of Reply After Refusal — Civil Court Cannot Review Its Own Order Without Statutory Authority. The court held that a Civil Court cannot sit in appeal over its own order under Order 37 CPC and set it aside without specific provision.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Rentworks India Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the respondent, Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Deposit of Arbitral Award Amount Pending Challenge. Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not empower the court to order deposit of the award amount; it only allows interim measures of protection in respect of the subject matter of the arbitration agreement.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, M/s. AFCONS Infrastructure Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking directions aga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

28 Aug 2013

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Magistrate's Order in Cooperative Bank Directors' Case — Abuse of Process and Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 468, 477A IPC read with Section 34 IPC quashed as the Magistrate ignored the High Court's earlier order restoring the complaint for consideration under Section 202 CrPC, and the directors being public servants required sanction for prosecution.

19 Aug 2013

The applicants, nine directors of a cooperative bank, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking qu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Delay in Application by Minor Son of Deceased Police Constable. Technical Limitation Under Government Resolution Not Applicable When Earlier Application Was Made on Behalf of Minor.

1 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Ritesh Gotmare, was the son of a police constable who died in a road accident along with his wife on 11.02.1996, when the petitioner w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution Petition for Specific Performance Despite Delay, Holding Limitation for Execution Runs from Date of Decree Becoming Final. The court clarified that under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the 12-year period for execution of a decree for specific performance commences from the date the decree becomes final, not from the date of the decree.

13 Jun 2013

The petitioner, the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.1208 of 1994, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale dated 25th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Redeem Mortgage in Co-operative Bank Recovery Proceeding — Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court held that the bank failed to follow the mandatory procedure under the Act and the recovery certificate was not properly executed, entitling the petitioner to redeem the property by paying the outstanding dues.

20 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Niranjan D. Woody, owned a plot of land in Santacruz with a building containing a residential flat and eight tenants. He availed an ov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows De-exhibition of Documents in Civil Suit — No Opportunity Given to Prove Documents. Court holds that de-exhibition of documents is permissible under CPC and that plaintiff must be given opportunity to prove documents before they are excluded.

10 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Sunil Tukaram Bharadkar, filed a civil suit (Civil Suit No.3600 of 2004) against the respondent, Santosh Gopichand Rane. On 19-7-2005,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Earnest Money in Tender Withdrawal Case — Forfeiture Order Set Aside. Petitioner's withdrawal of offer before tender opening due to delay held valid, and forfeiture of earnest money without contractual basis was illegal.

16 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Vinod J. Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the order of forfeiture of earnest money passed by the Mira-Bhayand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition of POTA Detenus Seeking Release on Ground of Unlawful Detention. Court holds that detention under POTA is valid and habeas corpus cannot be used to challenge conditions of detention or seek bail.

30 Jan 2006

The petitioners, Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan and others, filed a habeas corpus petition before the Bombay High Court seeking release from detention unde...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)