Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

418 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Abroad; State Legislations of Orissa, Bihar, Kerala and Jharkhand Under Scrutiny

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case involves a batch of civil appeals before the Supreme Court concerning the levy of entry tax on goods imported from foreign countr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SVLDR Scheme Benefits for Redemption Fine Waiver and Directs Acceptance of Withdrawn Application. The Court held that redemption fine is covered under the waiver provisions of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and that rejection on erroneous ground of withdrawal is invalid.

26 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dealt with a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by a limited liability partnership firm and its partners chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MSRTC's Petition in Driver's Disciplinary Case, Upholds Setting Aside of Penalty but Reduces Back Wages. Acquittal in Criminal Case Under Bombay Prohibition Act Does Not Automatically Exonerate Employee, But Penalty Must Be Proportionate to Misconduct.

18 Oct 2023

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, which partly allowed the complaint fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Directs Reconsideration of Application Under 'Litigation' Category. Petitioner's application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 rejected due to misclassification; court holds that mere pendency of appeal qualifies as 'litigation' and directs respondents to process application accordingly.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioners, Morde Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, Directs Substitution of Estimated Amount with Tax Dues as Per Adjudicated Order. The court held that for the purpose of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the 'tax dues' refer to the amount determined in the order-in-original, not the show cause notice, even if the order was set aside on appeal.

5 Nov 2020

The three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the respondents' action in issuing forms SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

24 Jan 2018

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Modvat/CENVAT Credit Case — Assessee Entitled to Credit on Moulds Supplied by OEM Without Ownership or Lease. The court held that after the 1994 amendment, Rules 57Q and 57R of Central Excise Rules, 1944 do not require ownership or lease of capital goods for availing credit; use in manufacture is sufficient.

16 Feb 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Show-Cause Notice for Penalty Under Section 11AC Not Barred by Section 11A(2B) Despite Pre-Notice Duty Payment. CESTAT Erred in Holding That Payment of Duty Before Show-Cause Notice Precludes Issuance of Notice for Penalty.

9 Feb 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)