Search Results for "open and peaceful enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "open and peaceful enjoyment"

212 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for De-requisition of Lands Under Requisitioning Act — Compensation Already Determined and Property Not Released. The Court held that the appellants' remedy lies in seeking compensation enhancement, not de-requisition, as the property was not released within the statutory period under Section 6(1A) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952.

24 Nov 2020

The case involves an appeal by special leave against the Karnataka High Court's judgment dated 11.01.2008 in W.P. 8340/2006. The appellants, B.K. Ravi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; substantial questions of law not made out.

13 Apr 2017

The appellant, Smt. Sathyamma, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 3.1...

High Court

Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Decides Regular First Appeal in a Partition, Declaration and Injunction Suit. The Court Allows or Dismisses the Appeal Based on the Merits of the Case.

29 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows De-amalgamation of Plots in CIDCO Area — Rejection Order Quashed. Held that Note 5 below Table-3 of the General Development Control Regulations does not prohibit de-amalgamation of plots falling in Category 8, and the authority must consider the application on merits without imposing a blanket bar.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, Anupam Harnath Goyal (aged 80) and his wife Kamal (aged 71), owned two adjacent plots (283 and 284) in Sector N-3, CIDCO, Aurangabad....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Setting Aside Appellate Decree for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's findings was perverse and not based on evidence, violating Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

16 Dec 2016

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the ju...

Supreme Court

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

1 Jan 1970

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition on Police Assistance for Injunction Implementation — Trial Court's Direction Under Section 151 CPC Challenged for Res Judicata and Possession Violations

23 Jul 2026

The writ petition arose from a civil suit (O.S. No. 1708/2024) filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the petitioners-defendants seeking a declarat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Airport Appellate Tribunal Order in Eviction Proceedings under Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. Petitioner, an 85-year-old agriculturist, challenged the Tribunal's order confirming eviction from airport premises, raising issues of jurisdiction and unauthorized occupation.

30 Oct 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the order dated 10th July 2013 passed by the Chairperson of the Airport Ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Finds Trial Court Erred in Decreeing Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

29 Aug 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 16.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Doddaballapur, in OS No.275/2002 (old No.76/2001), d...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Property Acquired by Father-in-Law Not Joint Family Property. Daughter-in-law cannot claim share in property purchased by father-in-law in name of son as it is not ancestral or joint family property under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

7 Jun 2013

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the second defendant against the judgment and decree of the trial court in a partition suit. The pla...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)