Search Results for "maritime claims"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "maritime claims"

164 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

29 Nov 2022

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.

18 Sep 2025

The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

24 Apr 2013

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Policy Circular on Export Obligation Discharge. Circular requiring actual use of imported materials for export obligation discharge under Advance Authorization Scheme held ultra vires the Foreign Trade Policy and the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.

8 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Essar Shipping Limited, a company engaged in maritime transport services, challenged Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 dated 1st January, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Remands for Fresh Determination on Disability and Wages. Commissioner's order set aside for failure to consider relevant evidence and apply correct legal principles under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

5 Jan 2024

The appeal was filed by the Shipping Corporation of India Limited, the employer, under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Court Holds That Construction of Contractual Clause by Arbitrator Falls Within Arbitral Domain and Is Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jun 2019

The case involves five appeals filed by Central Warehousing Corporation (the appellant) against a common judgment dated 18.02.2019 dismissing its arbi...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)