Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Policy Circular on Export Obligation Discharge. Circular requiring actual use of imported materials for export obligation discharge under Advance Authorization Scheme held ultra vires the Foreign Trade Policy and the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Essar Shipping Limited, a company engaged in maritime transport services, challenged Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 dated 1st January, 2008 issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). The circular mandated that imported materials under the Advance Authorization Scheme must be actually used in the export product and prohibited deemed discharge of export obligation. The petitioner argued that the circular was ultra vires the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 and the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992, as it imposed conditions not found in the policy or the Act. The respondents contended that the circular was a valid clarification. The court analyzed the provisions of the FTDR Act and the FTP, noting that the FTP provided for deemed discharge in certain cases. The court held that the DGFT's power to issue circulars is limited to implementing the policy and cannot override or amend it. The circular was found to be inconsistent with the FTP and therefore ultra vires. The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the circular to the extent it prohibited deemed discharge of export obligation.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Ultra Vires - Policy Circular - The DGFT issued a circular imposing additional conditions for discharge of export obligation under Advance Authorization Scheme, which were not found in the Foreign Trade Policy or the Act. The court held that such circular, being inconsistent with the parent policy and statute, is ultra vires and cannot be sustained. (Paras 1-30)

B) Foreign Trade - Export Obligation - Deemed Discharge - The Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 provided for deemed discharge of export obligation in certain cases. The impugned circular sought to override this by requiring actual use of imported materials. The court held that the circular cannot override the policy provisions and is invalid. (Paras 10-25)

C) Constitutional Law - Delegated Legislation - Power to Issue Circulars - The DGFT's power to issue policy circulars is limited to clarifying or implementing the policy, not to amend or add new conditions. The impugned circular exceeded this power and was struck down. (Paras 15-28)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 dated 1st January, 2008 issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade, which mandates that imported materials under Advance Authorization must be actually used in the export product and prohibits deemed discharge of export obligation, is ultra vires the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 and the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 dated 1st January, 2008 is quashed to the extent it prohibits deemed discharge of export obligation under the Advance Authorization Scheme.

Law Points

  • Doctrine of ultra vires
  • Interpretation of exemption notifications
  • Promissory estoppel
  • Legitimate expectation
  • Delegated legislation
  • Power to issue policy circulars
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (02) 83

WRIT PETITION NO. 1335 OF 2010

2022-02-08

DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ, M. S. KARNIK, J.

Mr. Vikram Nankani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prithviraj Choudhari a/w Mr. Archit Virmani and i/by Mr. Nikhil Mengde for petitioner. Mr. Anil C. Singh, ASG a/w Mr. M. S. Bhardwaj, Mr. Aditya Thakkar and Mr. D. P. Singh for respondents.

Essar Shipping Limited

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a policy circular issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 dated 1st January, 2008.

Filing Reason

The circular imposed additional conditions for discharge of export obligation under Advance Authorization Scheme, which were not in the Foreign Trade Policy.

Issues

Whether Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 is ultra vires the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 and the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The circular imposes conditions not found in the FTP or the Act, and is therefore ultra vires. Respondents: The circular is a valid clarification and within the DGFT's powers.

Ratio Decidendi

A policy circular issued by the DGFT cannot override or amend the provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy or the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. Any circular that imposes conditions inconsistent with the parent policy or statute is ultra vires and invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and, inter alia, engaged in the business of rendering maritime transport services. The first respondent is the Union of India and the other 4 (four) respondents are the officers of the first respondent, who are obliged to exercise powers and discharge duties in terms of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. By instituting this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge Policy Circular No.25 of 2007 dated 1st January, 2008 issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2010, reserved on December 23, 2021, and judgment delivered on February 8, 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MSETCL — Holds Termination Without Show Cause Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Contractual Stipulations. The court set aside the termination order and di...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification Proceedings Against Zilla Parishad Councillors for Alleged Defection — Whip Not Issued in Compliance with Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986. The court held that without a vali...