Search Results for "foreign arbitration award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "foreign arbitration award"

233 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Consolidation of Claims from Nine Contracts with Identical Terms Does Not Violate Fundamental Policy of Indian Law Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Feb 2023

The petitioner, BST Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., entered into nine contracts with the respondent, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., for the purchase o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order Permitting Evidence in Arbitration Challenge. The Court held that the 2019 amendment to Section 34(2)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is clarificatory and limits evidence to the arbitral record, disallowing additional evidence in Section 34 proceedings except in exceptional circumstances.

19 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 12.03.1998, which was challenged by the respondents through an application under Section 34 of the Arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

1 Nov 2022

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Sand Removal Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of contractual terms was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not violate public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2021

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Favor of ICC Arbitration Under Umbrella Agreement. Disputes arising from multiple purchase orders and a pricing agreement are governed by the arbitration clause in the umbrella agreement, not individual purchase orders.

16 Sep 2020

The case involves a dispute between Balasore Alloys Limited (petitioner/applicant) and Medima LLC (respondent) arising from a business transaction for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

10 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Awards in Charter Party Freight Dispute — Public Policy Objection Rejected. The court held that the expression 'public policy' under Section 48(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is to be narrowly construed and does not include mere errors of law or fact, and that the respondent had received proper notice of the arbitration.

14 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Curzon Maritime Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, was the disponent owner of the vessel SHIKOKU PRIDE. T...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)