Search Results for "district consumer commission"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee's Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute — Holds Additional Demand Time-Barred for Disconnection Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. The two-year limitation for disconnection runs from the date of the original bill, not from discovery of a billing mistake.

The case involves a dispute between the Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (appellant/licensee) and Rahamatullah Khan alias Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Post Office in Indira Vikas Patra Loss Case — Rules No Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Lost Bearer Instrument Cannot Be Replaced Under Rule 7(2) of Indira Vikas Patra Rules, 1986.

The case involves appeals by the Superintendent of Post Office, Bolangir Division, Odisha, against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal Seeking Substitution of Director in Consumer Execution Proceedings During CIRP. Moratorium under Section 14 of IBC does not bar substitution of director as the corporate debtor remains liable.

The case involves an appeal filed by Sudheschandra Gupta against an order dated 01.10.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Leave Encashment to Retired Judge Appointed as President of State Consumer Commission. Petitioner entitled to leave encashment under Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 for entire tenure, not limited to COVID-19 period.

The petitioner, Justice Ashok Pitambar Bhangale, a retired Judge of the Bombay High Court, was appointed as the President of the Maharashtra State Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...